Gardened | Ethan Marcotte

We’re dealing with the results of bad defaults, deployed at a terrible scale.

The way we make websites is built on a false assumption: that the tools we use are the right ones for the job. Now – more than ever – we should be questioning why common frameworks, dependencies, libraries, and other packages are often poorly optimised. Engineers can put in the work (and many do) to fix those issues, but if the default state is broken then most won't.

In other words, they have to give a damn. But giving a damn doesn’t scale.

It's the users that pay in the short-term, but in the long-term Ethan makes a valid point that it may ultimately mean the tech industry will require greater oversight and regulation. Some of what makes the web great might be lost in that process but, as he puts it:

If other industries follow building codes and regulations, why shouldn’t we?

Explore Other Notes

Newer

A static future

I like this definition. I think it does a good job of encapsulating why static sites are beneficial whilst also being clear that there are very few things a static site can't be. As Josh demonstrates …

Older

Hamonshu

A really like Eric's latest redesign. I'm a huge fan of ink drawings in general, so it figures I'd like this, but more than the graphic elements I feel like the layout manages to strike a great …

  • <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <p>The way we make websites is built on a false assumption:&nbsp;that the tools we use are the right ones for the job. Now – more than ever – we should be questioning why common frameworks, …</p> </body> </html>
  • Murray Adcock.
Journal permalink