Ancestors and descendants | Eric Meyer

Eric has written an often brilliantly funny canned history of the way CSS worked (or, more specifically, didn't) in the early days of the Web. It's worth a read just to see how good we have it today, a sentiment they sum up in such excellent fashion that I had to save it:

I know it’s still fashionable to complain about how CSS is all janky and weird and unapproachable, but child, the wrinkles of today are a sunny park stroll compared to the jagged icebound cliff we faced at the dawn of CSS.

Explore Other Notes

Newer

Types of type

Apparently, the type design world has recently thrown out its formal classification system and has yet to decide on a replacement. ILT (as ever) does a great job of summarising the current …

Older

Weighing up UX

There's a lot of interesting thoughts packed into this overview of UX Fest 2021, but the bits that really hit home were Jeremy's musings on A/B testing and dark patterns, particularly how one can …

  • <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <p>Eric has written an often brilliantly funny canned history of the way CSS worked (or, more specifically,&nbsp;<strong>didn't</strong>) in the early days of the Web. It's worth a read just to see how good …</p> </body> </html>
  • Murray Adcock.
Journal permalink